CVE-2025-11226: Logback-core Vulnerability Alert

Hey everyone, let's talk about a pretty important security alert that's popped up concerning a vulnerability in logback-core, specifically version 1.4.5.jar. We're talking about CVE-2025-11226, which has been flagged as a medium severity vulnerability. Now, I know 'medium' might sound not too bad, but in the world of cybersecurity, even medium can pack a punch if exploited. This alert came through our jorgerdemocorp-mend-selfhosted and example-of-customPropertyProductMapping systems, so it's definitely something we need to pay attention to across our projects.

Understanding the Vulnerable Library: logback-core-1.4.5.jar

So, what exactly is logback-core-1.4.5.jar? This is a core component of the Logback logging framework, which is super popular in Java applications. Think of it as the engine that handles all your application's logging. When you're developing an app, especially with frameworks like Spring Boot, logging is crucial for debugging, monitoring, and understanding what your application is doing. The logback-core library is essentially the foundation upon which more advanced logging features are built. It's responsible for the basic mechanics of how messages are processed and sent to various destinations, like console output, files, or databases. The dependency hierarchy here shows that it's nested quite deeply, starting from spring-boot-starter-web version 3.0.3, going down through spring-boot-starter, spring-boot-starter-logging, logback-classic, and finally hitting our vulnerable logback-core-1.4.5.jar. This means if you're using pretty standard Spring Boot web applications, chances are you might be affected. The vulnerability was found in a specific commit, 37f40847eef7f4533732cd83f440116af482d0b0, within the jorgerdemocorp-mend-selfhosted/test-to-delete repository, and it's present in the main branch. This gives us a concrete point of reference for where this issue was introduced or exists. Understanding this chain is key because it highlights how widespread the potential impact can be. Even if you're not directly including logback-core in your dependencies, a framework you are using might be pulling it in, as seen in this case with Spring Boot. It’s a stark reminder of the interconnectedness of software components and the importance of supply chain security. Knowing the path also helps us pinpoint the exact versions we need to check and potentially update. So, when we talk about logback-core-1.4.5.jar, we're talking about a fundamental piece of logging infrastructure that, in this specific version, has a known security weakness.

Diving Deep into CVE-2025-11226 Details

Alright guys, let's get into the nitty-gritty of CVE-2025-11226. This vulnerability, found in Logback-core versions up to and including 1.5.18, is an ACE (Arbitrary Code Execution) vulnerability specifically related to conditional configuration file processing. What does that mean in plain English? It means an attacker could potentially trick your application into running malicious code. How could they do this? Well, the vulnerability description points to a couple of scenarios. First, if an attacker can compromise an existing Logback configuration file, they could inject malicious commands into it. Second, they could inject an environment variable before your program even starts, and this variable could point to a malicious configuration file. Now, here's the catch: this attack isn't a walk in the park. It requires several conditions to be met. For starters, you must have the Janino library and the Spring Framework present on your application's classpath. These are common dependencies, especially in Spring Boot applications, which is why this is concerning. On top of that, the attacker needs to have write access to a configuration file, or be able to inject that malicious environment variable. This implies a certain level of privilege is already needed. The attacker can't just waltz in and exploit this on a completely secured system without prior access or compromise. However, if these conditions are met, the consequences can be severe. Arbitrary code execution means an attacker could potentially take full control of your application or server, leading to data breaches, system disruption, or further network infiltration. The vulnerability was published on October 1st, 2025, and the official URL for more details is https://www.mend.io/vulnerability-database/CVE-2025-11226. It's critical to understand these prerequisites because they help us assess the immediate risk to our specific environments. While it requires existing privileges, the potential for catastrophic damage makes it a high-priority item to address.

Understanding the CVSS 3 Score: 6.9 (Medium)

Let's break down the CVSS 3 Score for CVE-2025-11226, which sits at 6.9. This score places it squarely in the medium severity category. But what do these numbers and categories actually mean for us? CVSS, or the Common Vulnerability Scoring System, is a standardized way to assess the severity of security vulnerabilities. A score of 6.9 suggests a significant risk, but not an immediately critical one that demands shutdown of all systems. Let's look at the metrics that contribute to this score:

• Exploitability Metrics: These describe how easy it is to exploit the vulnerability.

  • Attack Vector: Local: This means the attacker needs to have local access to the system or application. They can't exploit this remotely over the network without first gaining some form of local foothold. This is a crucial piece of information, as it implies the attacker already has some level of access.
  • Attack Complexity: Low: Once the attacker has local access, exploiting the vulnerability itself is relatively easy. There aren't many complex steps or conditions required for the exploit to work.
  • Privileges Required: High: This is a big one, guys. The attacker needs to have high-level privileges on the system to carry out the attack. This means they likely need to be an administrator or have a compromised account with significant permissions. This significantly raises the bar for exploitation.
  • User Interaction: Required: The attacker needs some level of user involvement to succeed. This could mean tricking a user into running a specific file or clicking a link, although in the context of file configuration, it might be more about social engineering or exploiting existing user workflows.
  • Scope: Changed: This indicates that the vulnerability can affect components beyond the security scope of the vulnerable component itself. In simpler terms, a successful exploit could potentially impact other parts of the system or application that are normally isolated.

• Impact Metrics: These describe the consequences of a successful exploit.

  • Confidentiality Impact: High: If exploited, the attacker can gain access to all sensitive information managed by the vulnerable component. This could include user data, credentials, or proprietary information.
  • Integrity Impact: Low: The attacker can modify or delete some data, but likely not all data, or the modification might not be critical to the overall system's function.
  • Availability Impact: Low: The exploit might cause some disruption or downtime, but it's unlikely to bring the entire system crashing down.

So, while the Attack Complexity is low and the Confidentiality Impact is high, the requirements for Privileges Required (High) and User Interaction (Required) pull the overall score down from critical levels. However, a High Confidentiality Impact combined with Low complexity and Local access means that if an attacker does gain high privileges, they can easily steal sensitive data. For more details on how these scores are calculated, you can check out the CVSS 3 Calculator. Understanding this breakdown helps us prioritize our response. The fact that high privileges are required is a mitigating factor, but we absolutely cannot ignore the potential for data compromise.

The Suggested Fix: Upgrade and Patch Up!

Okay, so we've identified the problem with CVE-2025-11226 in logback-core-1.4.5.jar. Now, what's the game plan? The good news is there's a clear and recommended fix, and it falls under the standard procedure for dealing with these kinds of vulnerabilities: upgrade the version. The recommended fix is to upgrade ch.qos.logback:logback-core to version 1.5.19. This is a direct fix for the vulnerable library itself. However, as we saw in the dependency tree, logback-core is often pulled in transitively by other libraries. In this specific case, the vulnerability report indicates that a direct dependency fix is also recommended for org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web to version 3.4.11. This suggests that upgrading the Spring Boot starter web package will bring in a compatible, non-vulnerable version of logback-core. This is often the preferred approach when dealing with transitive dependencies, as it ensures compatibility within the framework you're using. The fix resolution information comes from https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-25qh-j22f-pwp8, and the fix was released on October 1st, 2025.

So, what does this mean for us in practice?

1. Identify Affected Projects: First, we need to scan all our projects to confirm which ones are actually using logback-core-1.4.5.jar or a version that transitively includes it via spring-boot-starter-web or similar. The information provided shows our specific affected version is 1.4.5.
2. Plan the Upgrade: Once identified, we need to carefully plan the upgrade. For projects using spring-boot-starter-web, upgrading to version 3.4.11 should pull in the correct logback-core version. For projects that might be including logback-core more directly, ensure you're targeting 1.5.19 or a later, secure version.
3. Test Thoroughly: After upgrading, always perform thorough testing. Logging configurations can be complex, and changes, even security patches, can sometimes introduce regressions or unexpected behavior. Test your application's functionality, especially around logging outputs and error handling.
4. Consider Mitigation (If Upgrade is Delayed): If an immediate upgrade isn't feasible due to complex release cycles or compatibility issues, explore mitigation strategies. However, given the ACE nature of this vulnerability, direct patching or upgrading is strongly advised. Relying solely on mitigation without patching is risky.

This is a standard security patching process, but it's crucial we act promptly. Don't just ignore that 'medium' tag; understand the potential impact and follow through with the fix. We've got the path forward laid out, let's get our systems secured!

• [ ] Check this box to open an automated fix PR